07/04/06
By Lauren Gregory, Rome News-Tribune Staff Writer
Respond to this story
Email this story to a friend
A Floyd County Superior Court judge has halted work on a
railroad project near Desoto Hill until she determines whether
it might involve improper condemnation of a Rome family’s
property.
Superior Court Judge Tami Colston ordered a temporary
restraining order barring the Georgia Department of
Transportation from moving forward with the project before she
hears evidence on the matter during a hearing scheduled for
Thursday at 9 a.m.
Follow our links to two background stories.
Story 1
Story 2
If enough evidence is presented to support claims by
plaintiffs David Fowler Sr., Kirk Rickman, Deborah Rickman and
David Fowler Jr., Colston could decide to continue the
injunction while their lawsuit against the DOT is resolved.
The suit was filed June 30, alleging condemnations filed by
the state erroneously reported the size of a right of way next
to railroad tracks by the Desoto Avenue property owned by the
Fowlers and the Rickman's. The condemnations, the suit states,
“left a strip of land 25 feet in width which is owned by the
plaintiffs but from which the plaintiffs have been now denied
any lawful means of access.”
The DOT has been planning for several years to move the
tracks south of their current path to accommodate the widening
of Martha Berry Boulevard near John Davenport Drive. But
construction never began, as David Fowler Jr. first challenged
the project in U.S. District Court in January 2005, filing a
lawsuit alleging the project would damage a Civil War earthwork
fort on Desoto Hill.
Court records show that suit ended in favor of the Federal
Highway Administration, giving DOT officials the opportunity to
proceed. But before groundbreaking on the project could occur,
Fowler filed his condemnation suit in superior court and won
another opportunity to stop the work.
The new suit attacks the issue from a new direction, Fowler
said, but it addresses the same problem the family has always
had with the DOT project: historic preservation. “It started off
that they were taking my land, and then I found out about the
fort,” he said. “I figured all that out, and it became a
preservation issue.”
Neither Fowler’s attorney, Wright Gammon of Cedartown, nor
any representative from the Georgia Attorney General’s office —
which is expected to provide defense for the DOT — could be
reached for comment Monday.